Pictures and Diagrams may be wrong

S-shaped Freestyle Pull

Diagrams aren’t always what they should be!

On this site, there are reviews of many good (and some not so good) books that focus on improving technique. The most common method is to use photos and drawings showing sequences of “correct” techniques. But some of these are not that clear, and others may be just plain wrong (link to Wrong or just Weird examples).  Professor Brent S. Rushall, San Diego State University, has written about this in great detail in his Swimming Science Bulletin, No. 33:

“Cartoons have been accepted as being representative of actual movement patterns. This form of representation still persists today (see Maglischo, 2003). Few, if any, question the reliability and accuracy of the illustrations. Almost all depictions trace the path of the finger tips; implicitly suggesting that the hand extremity was the best anatomical feature to orient one’s understanding and teaching of swimming movements.”

Click here to see Rushall’s full article in a new window.

Categories: efficiency, freestyle, improving techniques, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Strokes per Length – Baseline

As your skills improve and you swim more efficiently, the number of strokes you need to cover a length will decrease. At some point, you will reach an optimum that gives you faster times with fewer strokes.

measurement model

Johnny Stroker

But what is a good starting point or baseline? A stroke is the distance you pull with one arm, i.e. it takes 2 strokes for a full cycle in freestyle. Though people come in different sizes and shapes, we can make a simple body measurement to determine your “custom” stroke length and calculate how many strokes would make a length with no slippage or over-gliding.

Measure

You can do this by standing next to a wall. Measure the distance from your arm’s reach above your head to the hip area, where you will give the final push-off for your stroke. Mark these two places on the wall.

You can stretch a bit for the reach, but keep your spine straight (remember that getting out of alignment will slow you down). Mark where your wrist is on the reach. Then do the same for the push-off hand position. The distance between is your Stroke Length.

For example, for “Johnny” the Stroke Length is 48 in.
The 25 yard pool is 900 in. long (25 yds. x 36 in.).
900 in. divided by 48 in. = 18.75 strokes per length, assuming no slippage and no glide between strokes.  Now, count your strokes and see if you can make a length with 19 strokes or less.

How do you count?

Since we typically push off from the wall, it’s a matter of personal preference on how “strict” you want to be. You don’t want a big push-off and a long glide to give you an inaccurate baseline. This is not a competition, just a self-evaluation tool. Ideally, a 50 meter pool would be even better. I suggest counting the first stroke no further than a body length from the wall. Note that for the example above, the swimmer’s height is 70 in., meaning the whole 25 yds. is only about 13 body lengths!

graph strokes vs time

The green area is the “sweet spot” of efficiency.

While counting, swim at an effort level that you can sustain aerobically (longer distance, minimum of 5 minutes continuous swimming). Concentrate on using a smooth, even arm stroke. As you lower your drag, you will get more distance for the same effort. See the video section for examples of the full stroke.

Conclusion

For each swimmer, there is a “sweet spot” (green area on the graph) where stroke efficiency maximizes performance for the effort. In general, taller, thinner swimmers will always have an advantage.

Over-gliding means you are not maintaining a consistent speed. Slipping typically occurs when your effort level increases and you become fatigued, causing stroke faults such as the notorious “dropped elbow.”

Categories: efficiency, freestyle, improving techniques, stroke count vs. time | Tags: | Comments Off

What is the “speed limit” for swimming?

Since the early 1900s, when sports organizations began to methodically keep records of absolute performance, such as times for the 100 yd. dash, experts have speculated on what the ultimate limits of performance are. In the 1930s and 1940s, four minutes was regarded as the ultimate limit for the mile run. Many of these “limits” were based on analysis of the physical capacity of humans. In 1954, Roger Bannister broke the 4 minute barrier with 3:59.4. As of March 2014, the record for the mile has fallen to 3:43.13 (1999).

In swimming, the first “magic” number was 1 minute for the 100m. freestyle, which Johnny Weismuller broke (58.6 s. in 1922). Now, the record is 46.91 s. This record was set during the “polyurethane” suit era, suits which were banned in 2010. The progression of records is nicely documented in this Wikipedia link: World record progression 100 metres freestyle.

This brings us to the question: What is the limit for the 100 m. freestyle? Below is a 5 part video series featuring 2 time Olympic champion Alex Popov.  It covers his training and stroke technique in detail and addresses “theoretical limits” for swimming speed.

Opinion (IMHO): I believe that the best chance of a breakthrough in freestyle performance will be accomplished with a radical change in kicking technique and timing. As you watch these videos, note that how Popov uses the dolphin kick in some drills.

“Popov – What is the Limit?” Part 2:

Here are links to view the other 4 parts:
Alexander Popov, What is the Limit? Part 1 | Part 3 Part 4 | Part 5

Sun Yang

For another view of a champion that illustrates how the kick has evolved in freestyle, see this excellent underwater study of Sun Yang in the 1500 m. freestyle, 2012 Olympics (no funny plastic suits allowed!!). Note that he averages < 60 s. for each 100 meters, while using about 28 strokes per 50 meters. By 1950s standards for technique, he is breaking a lot of “rules” regarding body roll & alignment, kicking, head position, and more! Now, with the scientific studies of swimming, we know that those rules were not based on physics, and thus they were replaced by better techniques.

 

Categories: 1500 m. freestyle, breakthrough in technique, efficiency, freestyle, improving techniques, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , | Comments Off

Effort and Pulse Rate – an adjustment for swimming

Animated-heartbeat

Click image for original

 

(This article is informational only, and not meant to infer any medical advice. Please consult your physician as the ultimate authority on this serious health matter.)

Since my recent post on Measuring Progress in Swimming I saw a note in my old swimming log. It had an adjustment in pulse rate calculations. The standard formula:

220 – (your age) = Max. pulse rate

is based on running, cycling, and other activities where the body is upright (vs. horizontal when swimming). For swimming, the heart doesn’t have to work as hard because there are no “uphill” paths that the blood must travel. My note stated that I subtracting 10 from the base 220 in the calculation would adjust the pulse rate for swimming. That is,

220 – (your age) -10 = Max. pulse rate

As I checked for the latest information on heart rate monitoring, I found a range of medical opinions on establishing standards and using pulse rate measurements in workouts. It was surprising to find some controversy. With the latest hi-tech monitors,  there are more tools than ever for the average athlete to log physiological data. How it is used is another matter! Here are some links if you want to become a “quasi-expert” on the science:

Total Immersion Swimming suggests subtracting 10-15 beats per minute.
It would be nice if they helped you decide on 10 or 15! What number should I choose?

Healthy Living (AZ news site) suggests subtracting 12. I like that–about half the difference. The article is easy to read and cites authorative sources, such as the Merck manual.

The Flutter Over Heart Rate by Gina Kolata (N.Y. Times, 2008) has an in-depth discussion of IF, WHEN, and HOW you should use pulse rate during exercise.

Regarding the maximum rate, Greg Crowther of Washington University wrote (2001):
“In the laboratory, scientists consider a runner’s max HR to be the highest HR he/she reaches during a VO2max test, i.e., a 10-to-15-minute treadmill test of progressively increasing difficulty. In the absence of a treadmill…(link to article)”

Categories: effort, feelings vs. data, fitness, heart rate, pulse rate, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Swimming with your Brain

Swimming is a sport where you don’t need super fast reflexes or big muscles. The biggest improvements typically occur with stroke technique refinements.

Lee Stroker no. 1

When you practice, hopefully you spend some of the time trying to improve your stroke technique, but there are so many things to think about! In the “olden days”, swim teachers would concentrate on rote drills and detailed descriptions of each phase of a stroke and kick. But when we are in motion, as Lee Stroker illustrates above, it can be daunting to remember what the “correct way” is and apply it as you swim.

Here is my suggestion: Before a workout, think about 2-3 things that you want to concentrate on. Let’s call this your “mental game plan.” For example, in freestyle:

1. Kick from the hips
2. Exhale smoothly, not in a burst
3. Keep one eye submerged when you breathe by rolling slightly and looking back toward your armpit.

As you swim, pick one thing and concentrate on it for several laps. Then move on to another item and be aware of it for several laps. Swim some laps “mindlessly” and others concentrating on 1 or 2 things that are in your mental game plan. Over time, your effort will pay off–improvements will become “wired” into your muscle memory, and you can move on to even more refinement in your technique.

Categories: efficiency, feelings vs. data, improving techniques, mental aspects, Uncategorized | Comments Off